Tech Play 2: Eportfolio
Portfolios, whether traditional paper-based or the electric
variety, provide students and educators a chance to assess learning and growth
through projects and insights. Most classrooms today still employ the
traditional student achievement assessments that have been used for a hundred
years. We walk around with personal computers in our hands every day, but we're
still using pencil and paper to assess learning. Quizzes, tests and worksheets
arguably show the minimum amount of knowledge a student knows on a subject.
They cannot show you how the student thinks or their ability to solve problems.
They merely show you how they can regurgitate facts or how good they are at
guessing. The eenie, meenie, miney, moe method of assessing knowledge is about
as useful as a rotary phone in this day and age. What is the solution to
multiple choice tests? How do we teach with technology and how do we assess
it?
We know that project based learning which
incorporates multiple disciplines, activates and employs different parts of the
brain, and engages learners is where education is heading. There is a major
disconnection in how we want to teach our students and how the government says
they will be assessed. How do you assess project based learning and can those
assessments be of value to the student and the teacher? Portfolios are the
answer. After projects are completed and products are created the student is
called upon to create a portfolio. The minimum requirement of a portfolio is to
collect products created over a specific amount of time. After collection
occurs then selection must take place using critical thinking skills and
perhaps guideline that are either self-imposed or attained from the student's
teacher. The selection process allows the student to reevaluate the products
created. It is now time to reflect. Reflection of the creative process and
products helps the student identify their strengths and weaknesses. They should
then develop a strategy to either improve their past work or make improvements
in the future. Students will most likely make connections at this point
between their learning to other classes, subject, projects, and even life skills. If the portfolio is well documented then the
teacher or professor will be able to assess not just surface knowledge, but the
student’s ability to think, reflect, evaluate and make changes.
As a student I think I would prefer a portfolio as a means of
assessment. That is a difficult decision for me. I know that I can read and
answer questions. I’m an excellent test taker and it doesn’t take as much time
as creating a portfolio, but I love learning, creating and solving problems. At
this point in my life, I’ve been out of school for 16 plus years. I have a
family and illnesses that I deal with on a daily basis that take so much time
and energy. It is difficult not to be practical and choose the option that
takes less time and effort. As an educator I would much rather use the
portfolio system, but only if it could be sincere and if the students could
truly be evaluated on their work.
In my past life, when I was an undergrad student and the internet
was still fairly new, I was required to create portfolios for my communication
classes. These were the old fashioned kind with paper in a binder. I believe
that good portfolios should have the potential to grow with you and expand with
your knowledge. My traditional public relations portfolio is collecting dust in
a box somewhere at my mother’s house right now. And while it has some potential
to grow with me, carrying around a giant binder everywhere isn’t exactly
convenient. Eportfolios on the other hand, have an endless amount of potential,
not only for growth, but also for different mediums. They also are much easier
to share with others. Can you imagine trying to share a paper portfolio with
someone in Alaska? What do you do? Make copies of everything? Send the original
and just hope and pray that nothing happens to it and the person receiving it
sends it back? Thank goodness for
technology!
I took a look at Wikis, which I’d never explored other that Wikipedia,
Weebly, and Foliotek for my tech play this week. I loved the idea of a wiki for
a group project because it allows you to collaborate with others, but it didn’t
seem like the right place for a portfolio. It might be strange, but the site
seemed messy to me and didn’t seem like a place to make a professional
presentation. I took a more in depth look at weebly this week and started to
set up a page for my portfolio. I like how customizable it is and how you can
add to it endlessly. I then went on to
Foliotek and began creating a portfolio there. It is proprietary, but only
costs ten dollars a year to use the more advanced images and templates. It was
fairly easy to use and I really like how easy they make it to share with others
and receive their feedback.
If I was asking my students to create an e-portfolio I would have
them use weebly or another more kid friendly web based program. Foliotek is a
really neat program, but it just wouldn’t work well for elementary students
because of the cost. The tool I would
you for my students would be very intuitive and easy for them to operate. I
would like them to be able to add content easily. It would also be nice if the
templates were easy to read and not too customizable. I know that I can get
lost in designing something if I have too many choices, I am sure my students
will be the same way. I would prefer their time to be focused on the content.
Please find my new eportfolio at http://www.foliotek.me/KellyParsons.
Comments
Post a Comment